Posted by
Rhonda Keith Stephens on Friday, April 18, 2008 3:12:46 PM
PARVUM
OPUS
Number
274
______________________________________________
Inelegant Variations
Garner's Usage Tip of the Day renamed the “elegant
variation” (named by Fowler) the “inelegant variation”, that is, the suggestion
not to repeat the same word in a sentence or passage.
When
Fowler named this vice of language in the 1920s, "elegant"* was almost a pejorative word, commonly associated
with precious overrefinement. Today, however, the word has positive
connotations. So lest the reader think that the subject of this article is a
virtue rather than a vice in writing, it has been renamed unambiguously:
inelegant variation. ... [However,] variety for variety's sake in word
choice can confuse readers. If you call a car "the BMW" in one place
and "the sporty import" in another, can your reader be certain that
you're referring to the same car? If you write about a person's
"candor" in one sentence and "honesty" in the next, is the
reader to infer that you are distinguishing between two traits, or using
different words to refer to the same one?...
Today: "Elongated Yellow
Fruit. "Perhaps the most famous example of inelegant variation is
"elongated yellow fruit" as the second reference for
"banana." Thus Charles W. Morton named "the
elongated-yellow-fruit school of writing," citing examples such as
"the numbered spheroids" for billiard balls, "the
azure-whiskered wifeslayer " for Bluebeard, "hen-fruit safari"
for an Easter-egg hunt, "succulent bivalves" for oysters, and "rubber-tired
mastodon of the highway" for a truck. "The Elongated Yellow
Fruit," in A
Slight Sense of Outrage.... There is even a book full of these things,
in which a minister is "an old pulpit pounder," a prizefighter is
"a braggart of the squared circle," and a vegetarian is "a
confirmed spinach-addict."... See J.I. Rodale, The
Sophisticated Synonym Book....
Sometimes the variation leads to
real confusion. For example, in the following headline, the reader must wonder
at first whether "victim" and "loved one" refer to the same
person: "Victim's Family Can Witness Death of Loved One's Killer," Austin
Am.-Statesman, 17 Nov. 1995, at A11. The solution there would be to delete
"Victim's."
Reminds me of The
Romance Writer's Phrase Book, which lists 3,000 metaphors to be used in
the garden-variety romance novel. Cliché’s, or in other more or less elegant
words, pre-digested language.
Writers have also been told not to
repeat “said” in dialogue, but substitutions can become much more intrusive
than repeated “saids” which blend into the woodwork. You might as well make it
a rule to avoid frequent use of “the”. In grade school I was also taught not to
repeat “I” too much, and not to begin a letter to a friend with “I”. I do not
follow this rule. Do kids even learn to write letters in school anymore?
*Regarding
“elegant”, I think I wrote once about the confusion in the use of “elegant” in
Jane Austen, describing the character Anne Elliott in Persuasion.
In this case, “elegant” was a compliment, in its meaning of refined, without
excess; you can have an elegant solution to a problem in mathematics, for
instance. But some reader thought it meant too fancy, fussy, and affected. Not
so.
Red-Eye
Heard at the Post Office on tax day: “I’ll give you a
red-eye.” A red-eye is a hand-stamp, one of those round cancellation hand
stamps used with red ink. So add this to your list of definitions for red-eye:
red-eye gravy (made from ham drippings and coffee); a flight that arrives early
in the morning, maybe before dawn; the demonic effect of light on the retina in
photographs.
Attendee
Just wondering why we have attendees
at meetings instead of attenders. Attendants is already taken and
means something else. The “ee” ending usually denotes a passive recipient of
the action, grammatically, as in employee, donee, payee. By attending one
actively provides, not receives, one’s presence.
Anniversary Celebration
Fred and I were married fours years ago yesterday, on April
17, 2004. Here’s an interview
with my musician friend Sonny, whose performed with his band at our wedding.
(The video link only works in Explorer, not Mozilla Firefox or Netscape.)
Spoiler Alert: Beyond Here Be Drags
Ancient campaign history now ~ going back several weeks ~
but I finally figured out Geraldine Ferraro’s remark about Barack Obama.
Remember that? Something to the effect that he’s where he is in the campaign
because he’s black. She must have been thinking of John Edwards: good looking,
successful, left-wing. Obama is a slicker speaker, and, of course, black, but
aside from a few other superficial differences, there’s not a lot to choose
between them. But John Edwards couldn’t and didn’t offer to repair your soul,
which Obama’s wife said was on offer. Edwards wasn’t mailing out specially
blessed prayer cloth / shop rags with the imprint of his face on them.
I usually don’t seek out this sort
of insane rant, but while following this riveting campaign, I ran across Harlem
Dyse of the Black Anarchists, whose support of Obama (and his minister
Jeremiah Wright) goes like this:
Anytime you can sneak a fox to the door of the hen house
to play guard, do it. The hope of black America is that this fox’s teeth are
sharp and his appetite verocious. America’s chicken houses are full of
foul white birds that need to be slaughtered.
Of course it’s the word “verocious” that really caught my
eye, an efficient combination of ferocious and voracious. (Shouldn’t he have
tried out “foul white fowl”?) And Dyse’s unique take on global warming:
Obama’s
got soul and is the Fard Muhammad of our times. He is in touch with the gifts
God has given him through his skin color. He knows white people burn in the sun
and will hasten global warming and the destruction of the Ozone layer so that
the earth may be purged of evil. Obama’s soul is with black people & God.
And that’s easy to say because white people don’t have souls or a God.
Am I taking
his words out of context? Is he really a great guy if you get to know him? I
doubt it. “Out of context means” distorting the meaning, not taking a
sample of someone’s expressed ideas.
More
rhetorical analysis: Obama said small-town people in Pennsylvania (i.e. white),
bitter from lack of jobs, go to guns and religion and antipathy to people who
aren’t like them and anti-immigrant sentiment. That is, they have no reason
for their religion, no tradition for their gun ownership (including the
Bill of Rights), no rational opposition to illegal immigration that
might be affecting job availability. So instead of voting on the important
economic issues (which they can’t understand), they vote on trivial issues like
gay marriage. They’re bitter because they have to rely on family, friends, and
God rather than the government, as any rational person would. Well, it analyzes
itself, doesn’t it. But just let me note that guns usually mean something
different in South Chicago than in rural Pennsylvania. Apparently religion does
too. And does Obama mean that affluent people ~ say, rich Republicans ~ vote
rationally?
Incidentally,
Obama’s web site
has a bid for the Amish vote in Pennsylvania, but an Amish observer/journalist
says they don’t often vote for candidates, usually only for local issues.
______________________________________________
Trivium pursuit ~ rhetoric, grammar, and logic, or reading, writing,
and reckoning ~ Parvum
Opus
discusses language, education,
journalism, culture, and more. Parvum
Opus
by Rhonda Keith is a publication of KeithOps
/ Opus Publishing Services. Rhonda Keith is a long-time writer, editor, and
English teacher. Back issues from December 2002 may be found at http://www.keithops.us/. Feel free to e-mail
me with comments or queries. The PO mailing list is private, never given or
sold to anyone else. If you don't want to receive Parvum Opus, please e-mail, and
I'll take you off the mailing list. Copyright Rhonda Keith 2008. Parvum Opus or part of it may be
reproduced only with permission, but you may forward the entire newsletter as
long as the copyright remains.
Link here to look for books on Amazon.com!
Or click on
underlined book links.
T-SHIRTS AND OTHER
STUFF AT Parvum Opus CafePress shop:
"Flash in the Pants"
"If you're so smart why
aren't you me?"
"If you build it they won't
come"
Rage Boy/Bat Boy: Can you spot
the difference?
Akron U. Alma Mater: The Lost
Verse
PWE (Protestant Work Ethic) tote
bag
"I am here" T-shirt
"Someone went to Heaven and
all I got was this lousy T-shirt"
"I eat dead things"
doggy shirt and BBQ apron
Plus kids’ things, mouse pad,
teddy bear, coffee mugs, beer stein, and more!
PLUS Scot Tartans T-shirts and more
(custom orders available).
ELSEWHERE
Parvum
Opus now appears at http://cafelit.blogspot.com/. It is also
carried by the Hur Herald, a web
newspaper from Calhoun County, West Virginia. See Editor Bob Weaver's interview
with me (February 10, 2007 entry), and the PO every week in Columns.
WHEN SONNY GETS BLUE! Check out the
video and music clips of great blues man Sonny Robertson and the Howard Street
Blues Band at http://www.sonnyrobertson.com/
and http://www.youtube.com/rondaria,
with his new original song, "A Different Shade of Blue".
SEARCH
IT OUT ON AMAZON : "It is the glory of
God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a
matter." Proverbs 25:2; "Get wisdom! Even if it costs you everything, get
understanding!" Proverbs 4:7:
The poet Muriel Rukeyser said
the universe is not composed of atoms, but stories. The physicist Werner
Heisenberg said the universe is not made of matter, but music.
Go to Babelfish to translate
this page into Chinese, Dutch, French, German, Greek, Italian, Japanese,
Korean, Portuguese, Russian, or Spanish!